In DenierGate, watch New Scientist closely, as they do the unthinkable and try to defend gross scientific malpractice by saying it’s OK because other people did other things a little bit wrong, that were not related, and a long time ago. Move along ladies and gentlemen, there’s nothing to see…
The big problem for this formerly good publication is that they have decided already what the answer is to any question on climate-change (and the answer could be warm or cold but it’s always ALARMING). That leaves them clutching for sand-bags to prop up their position as the king-tide sweeps away any journalistic credibility they might have had.
“We should never despair, our Situation before has been unpromising and has changed for the better, so I trust, it will again. If new difficulties arise, we must only put forth new Exertions and proportion our Efforts to the exigency of the times.” —George Washington
Wednesday, December 16, 2009
You See Nothing...
Watts Up With That is taking apart New Scientist magazine this morning. New Science has been a shill for the global warming scaremongers - they are even mentioned in the famous CRU e-mails. WUWT is using that thing called "logic" and "truth" to debunk the attempts by New Science to cover up Climategate:
Read the rest of the article here.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment